// FOR PLATFORMS

Every platform is solving identity. None of them can see each other's answer.

YouTube verifies against YouTube. TikTok verifies against TikTok. A creator verified on one platform is still an unknown on every other. That is not a policy gap. It is a structural problem no single platform can solve. CreatorRegister is the neutral identity layer that sits between all of them.

// The Problem You Already Have

You can verify identity within your platform. Cross-platform identity needs a neutral graph.

Every major platform now operates its own creator identity stack: YouTube's likeness tooling, Meta Verified, TikTok's C2PA implementation, X's paid verification model, Kick's AI content controls. Each system works inside its own walls and stops there.

A creator verified on YouTube is still an unknown quantity on TikTok. A major Twitch streamer has no native trust bridge into Kick. When a fake account appears asserting that it is a known creator, your platform has no neutral external reference to check against. You can confirm who someone is inside your ecosystem, but external platform relationships require a cross-platform identity graph.

That gap is the attack surface. A human impostor can use real clips. An AI impostor can use synthetic ones. In both cases the operational question is the same: is this account inside the creator's validated identity graph? A single platform is not structurally positioned to answer that alone.

// The Gap Legislation Hasn't Closed

The regulatory focus is on AI. The deeper problem is unauthorised identity use.

The current wave of legislation is framed around AI-generated synthetic media. That is necessary, but incomplete. Platforms do not only face harm from fake media. They face harm from unauthorised accounts asserting that they are real people.

When a human creates a fake account using a creator's real name, real clips, and real branding, no deepfake detector fires. When an AI impostor does the same with synthetic content, the media may be fake but the trust failure is identical. In both cases, the account is believed because the platform has no authoritative way to know whether the publisher is the real person.

That is why the registry matters. The critical signal is not only "this media may be synthetic." It is "this account is not on the creator's verified identity record."

// What CreatorRegister Gives You

One query. A signed graph signal.

01 — Verified identity graph

When a creator authenticates their CreatorRegister record, they confirm which accounts across Twitch, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, X, and Kick are genuinely theirs. That record is the authoritative source — built by the creator, owned by the creator, queryable by any platform independently.

02 — Confirmed absence signal

When your platform queries CreatorRegister for an account asserting that it is a known creator and the target account is absent from the resolved creator's verified record, you receive a formal, timestamped, third-party signal that this account sits outside the creator's validated graph. That signal is actionable instantly.

03 — Proactive verification

The registry check happens at the point of account creation — before the first post, before the first message, before any fraud has taken place. This is not a takedown tool. It is a prevention layer that operates at the very moment that matters.

// Pre-Publication Control

Stop the impersonator before the content is posted.

Platforms currently try to detect harmful synthetic content after upload. That is too late. The harm begins at publication, and media analysis gets weaker as generation tools improve.

CreatorRegister operates at a different layer. It verifies whether the account presenting itself as a creator is actually part of that creator's authorised identity graph. That means a platform does not need to determine whether a video is real, AI-generated, or a reposted authentic clip in order to identify the core risk.

If the uploader is not part of the creator's verified record, the platform has a clear, queryable signal that this account is not authorised to represent that person. That is the security inversion the current stack is missing.

01 Account Created Bad Actor

Impostor tries to register using a known creator's likeness.

02 Registry API Platform API

Before public launch, platform queries CreatorRegister independently.

03 Trusted Signal CreatorRegister

Returns a timestamped "Confirmed Absence" signal for the account.

04 Blocked / Flagged Harm Prevented

Account is quarantined before zero posts. Platform stays safe.

Reactive content moderation

Triggered after upload
Analyses media pixels and audio
Probabilistic by definition
Harm may already have occurred

Pre-publication identity authorisation

Triggered at onboarding or before amplification
Analyses uploader identity, not the media
Deterministic at the account layer
Stops impersonation before content spreads

The critical question is not "is this media fake?" It is "is this account authorised to speak as this creator?"

// Regulatory Environment

The direction of travel is consistent across every jurisdiction.

Platforms are being held to higher standards of identity verification. These are the frameworks already shaping that obligation.

Legislation	Status	What it requires	How CreatorRegister helps
FTC Rule on Impersonation United States	In force	Platforms must take reasonable steps to prevent impersonation fraud. Facilitation of known impersonation creates civil liability.	Documented identity verification at onboarding. A queryable record of confirmed creator accounts and confirmed absences — the reasonable step that demonstrates due diligence.
EU Digital Services Act European Union	In force	Very Large Online Platforms must assess and mitigate systemic risks including fraud and impersonation. Fines up to 6% of global turnover for systemic failures.	A documented, independently auditable mitigation measure for creator impersonation risk — queryable via API, requiring no inter-platform data sharing.
Online Safety Act United Kingdom	In force	Statutory duty of care to protect users from fraud. Platforms must take reasonable steps to prevent scam activity reaching users.	Proactive identity verification before account activation — a documented reasonable step toward meeting the duty of care standard.
NO FAKES Act United States	Proposed In committee	If enacted: federal right of publicity over AI-generated digital replicas. Strict liability for platforms with actual knowledge of unauthorised replicas.	If enacted: identity confirmation layer for AI replica content — establishing whether a digital replica was authorised by the creator whose likeness was used.
EU DSA — identity amendment European Union	Proposed Ireland EU Presidency 2026	If adopted: mandatory identity verification for all social media users EU-wide.	Neutral third-party registry — trusted by all platforms precisely because it is owned by none of them.

The first three rows are in force today. CreatorRegister's value as a verification layer is immediate — it does not depend on future legislation passing.

// Why It Has to Be Neutral

Any platform can build internal verification. No platform can be the neutral source of truth for everyone else.

This is not difficult because the software is difficult. It is difficult because the trusted position cannot be occupied by a platform participant.

Meta could build a Meta identity layer. YouTube could build a YouTube identity layer. TikTok could build a TikTok identity layer. None of them can realistically become the neutral cross-platform authority that rival platforms, brands, agencies, regulators, courts, and creators all trust on equal terms.

TikTok will not accept YouTube's verification as the industry's shared source of truth. YouTube will not accept Meta's. X will not want a competitor governing identity assertions that matter outside its own ecosystem. The obstacle is not engineering capability. It is structural neutrality.

CreatorRegister has no platform to protect, no users to retain, and no competitive incentive to privilege one ecosystem over another. Every platform queries the same registry on equal terms. The neutrality is the infrastructure.

// What Exists

What exists. What it solves. What it doesn't.

Initiative	What it solves	What it doesn't solve
YouTube Likeness Detection	AI face detection within YouTube	No cross-platform coverage. Does not detect human impostors using real clips. A creator verified on YouTube is unknown on TikTok.
Adobe Content Authenticity / C2PA	Provenance of specific content files	Content-attached metadata, not an account registry. Platforms strip metadata on upload. Does not verify account ownership.
Creators Guild of America — Mosaic	Professional creator credentialing and work history	Focused on career records. Does not map verified platform handle ownership across competing platforms.
HAND Talent ID Registry	Identity for notable entertainment talent	B2B entertainment industry focus. Does not cover the broader social media creator economy.
Phyllo Identity API	Developer API for cross-platform creator data	B2B infrastructure for developers only. No public registry. No identity verification of the creator behind the handle.
xcr.sh	Cryptographic cross-platform handle ownership	Pre-traction. No public-facing searchable registry. Has not reached 100,000 creators.

No product currently combines OAuth-verified handle ownership, cross-platform coverage, a public queryable registry, and an API for third-party verification. That is what CreatorRegister is building.

// What Integration Looks Like

One API. Every platform. No inter-platform cooperation required.

01 — Query independently

Each platform queries CreatorRegister via its own independent API connection. No data sharing with competitors. No commercial agreements between rival platforms. Every platform accesses the same neutral registry on its own terms.

02 — Verified at onboarding

The registry check runs at the point of account creation. Accounts that match a verified creator record are confirmed. Accounts that don't are flagged for review. The signal is immediate and fires before the first user interaction.

03 — Auditable due diligence

Every query generates a timestamped record. In a regulatory review, a DSA audit, or an FTC investigation, that record documents that your platform took a concrete, verifiable step to check creator identity before allowing an account to operate.

Let's build this together.

We are scoping early API integration partnerships with platforms that want to be first. Design partners shape the API architecture, verification standards, and integration process — and are first to have the confirmed absence signal as a live enforcement tool.

[email protected]

Search the registry to see the identity infrastructure already in place.

Search the Registry →